Propane (R290) vs R32: The Refrigerant Duel for Greener Heat Pumps.

R290 stands out for its low GWP and improved energy efficiency, while R32 offers a compromise between performance and safety.

At the ISH 2023 trade fair in Frankfurt, all heat pump manufacturers presented their latest models, which run on R290, a new, more environmentally-friendly refrigerant better known as propane.

Après le remplacement du R410A par le R32, c’est maintenant au tour du R32 de voir monter son nouveau « rival » le R290. Dans cet article nous allons considérer les différences entre ces deux fluides frigorigènes, dans le but de vous aider dans votre choix d’un nouveau modèle de pompe à chaleur.

R290 is a natural hydrocarbon

It's a simple molecule made up of carbon and hydrogen (C3H8), making it a natural hydrocarbon. Unlike HFCs, it has no impact on the ozone layer, and its GWP (global warming potential) is very low.

R32, with the formula CH2F2, contains no chlorine. Its impact on the ozone layer is also very low, but greater than that of R290.

R290 has virtually zero GWP

Propane (R290) has a global warming potential of 3 extrêmement bas, ce qui en fait un gaz quasi neutre en termes d’effet de serre. Il est donc naturellement privilégié par les fabricants de pompe à chaleur.

R32 has a GWP of 675. This makes it a better choice than older fluids such as R410A or R407C.

Read also: differences between R410A and R32

R290 is more energy-efficient than R32

While R32 is excellent, enabling heat pumps to achieve COPs of between 3 and 5, R290 is a notch above, enabling COPs of between 4 and 6 if the right conditions are met.

In fact, R290 has very good thermodynamic properties, including better thermal conductivity (0.152 W/m-K) than R32 (0.084 W/m-K) and around twice the heat capacity (1.64 kJ/kg-K.), enabling it to transport heat more efficiently than R32 (0.85 kJ/kg-K).

What's more, the low-temperature performance of the two gases is pretty much the same. R32 has a boiling point of around -52°C, while R290 has a boiling point of around -42°C. While theoretically R32 has an advantage in that it can continue to evaporate above -42°C and down to -52°C, we're talking about temperatures so low as to be irrelevant: after all, we don't live in Yakutia. On the whole, at low temperatures, R290 remains at an advantage thanks to its better thermodynamic properties, which enable it to transport heat more efficiently.

R290 is highly flammable, much more so than R32

R32 is rated A2L for flammability, making it a mildly flammable fluid. With a minimum ignition energy of 100mJ, it takes a hell of a lot of energy to ignite it.

What's more, at least 14.4% of R32 in air concentration is required for combustion to occur, and the speed of flame propagation in the event of ignition is much lower than for highly flammable gases such as R290.

R290 is classified as A3, which is highly flammable. To compare with R32, its minimum ignition energy is 0.25mJ, i.e. 400 times smaller than that of R32.

What's more, it takes just 2.1% of R290 gas to initiate combustion in air, and the propagation speed of R290 is higher than that of R32.

R290 can therefore only be used when the refrigerant circuit is outside the home, which limits its use to outdoor air/water heat pumps.

Equipment compatibility problems

As the two gases have different properties, an R32 system may not be compatible with an R290 system, and vice versa. This prevents any gas replacement intervention.

For example, compressors need to be sized specifically for each gas, as there are differences in thermodynamic properties and vapour density. An R32 compressor may not be ideal for R290.

Heat exchangers must be sized to maximize heat transfer, but the two fluids have different thermal conductivities and heat capacities. A heat exchanger for R32 may not be very efficient for R290, and vice versa.

Finally, an R290 heat pump requires additional safety equipment due to the gas's high flammability. All systems that would not be necessary on a R32 heat pump.

If we were to replace R32 with R290, we wouldn't just be replacing a fluid, we'd also have to overhaul a number of internal components to ensure that everything runs smoothly, and above all put in place the necessary safety measures, given propane's high flammability. All of which makes this an operation that makes little economic sense.

The old R22 gas was more readily replaced by newer fluids such as R407 or R410A, with a few minor adjustments. Retrofitting is when you replace one gas with another and make adjustments to make it work. A R290 retrofit is virtually impossible, for safety reasons.

R290 is less expensive than R32

While R290 gas (€89 for 5kg) is less expensive than R32 (€139 for 5kg) when purchased in cylinders, this is not necessarily the case for a heat pump running on R290 compared with one running on R32. This is due to the safety measures required for R290: improved ventilation, leak detectors and specialized installation and maintenance protocols. All of which adds to the overall cost of the installed machine.

Finally, what should you choose between R32 and R290 for your outdoor air/water heat pump?

While R32 can be replaced by R290 quite advantageously, R32 remains usable under refrigerant regulations until 2030. Which makes it a sustainable candidate.

While R290 gives rise to more efficient machines and is more environmentally friendly than R32, it remains a highly flammable gas, which increases the cost of the heat pump and its installation.

Bien que moins cher à l’achat, le coût global d’une pompe à chaleur au R290 peut être élevé en raison des mesures de sécurité nécessaires. Le choix entre R290 et R32 dépendra donc des priorités en matière d’écologie, d’efficacité, et de sécurité. Ce qui est sûr c’est que les fabricants ont pris le virage du R290 pour une grande majorité, et que d’ici quelques années il n’y aura plus que ça. Certains autres fabricants comme Stiebel Eltron se sont plutôt tournés vers le R454C dont le PRG très bas de 148 se combine à une inflammabilité moins élevée que le R290.

Julien G.

Juliena mechanical engineering graduate and specialist in climate engineering since 2009, has become a writer specializing in renewable energies, with expertise in heat pumps and photovoltaic solar panels for individual housing.
See all articles by this author